Hello Readers!
Today, I finished reading the psychological-thriller ‘The Twins’, by Saskia Sarginson. I have written a review below which follows my usual ‘review from a writer’s perspective’. Instead of reviewing from a plot-based ‘this-is-what-happens next’ perspective, I review ad-hoc elements of a book which help me to develop as a writer. I capture notes on setting, character dialogue, theme and plot, along with all of the other elements, as I read, and I put them together into one big review. The review does contain spoilers, so if you intend on reading the book then please do so first. But please also visit again as I’d love to hear your thoughts.
I absolutely loved this debut novel from Saskia Sarginson. I purchased the book from a charity shop (as I love the re-use, re-love technique!), having been drawn in by the title, ‘The Twins’, and the accompanying image of two twin girls sitting side by side. I think the appeal was not only in the subject of twins and the psychology that exists between them, which I find fascinating, but I also think that at the time of buying, my mind was dwelling on another book that I had read a few years previous, which was also based on the subject of twins, and which I had loved. The book was ‘My Fearful Symmetry’, by Audrey Niffenegger.
Firstly, I must confess that I did find ‘The Twins’ difficult to connect with in the first few chapters, and at this point I was wondering if I was actually going to like the book. But I persevered, and I am so glad that I did! This really does show that you have to stick with a book in those times when you just want to give up!
The first person is told from the twins – Viola’s and Isolate’s perspectives, from the time of childhood to early adulthood. These perspectives are broken down into scenes in chapters and are given no particular order. Sometimes I did have to work out who was speaking, while other times it was made obvious from the outset. I feel that this haphazard technique (as opposed to ordered novels) made the book very interesting and natural. Sometimes we were thrown a little section of adulthood right in the middle of childhood, which I found brought the memory and the present day closer. We tend to see this technique a lot in films; where the scenes flick from past to present. I guess that sometimes showing memory and present day so close together gives both more emotional punch at that particular time (rather than spacing those connections chapters apart).
I am a huge fan of psychological thrillers, and I quite often love a character to be the leader over plot. I felt that in this book, plot and character were of equal measure, which was refreshing. I found that it took a bit of time to fall in love with the characters, but I think this goes with most books. May be humans need time to pass by in order for us to connect emotionally with a story, the more we become familiar with it. I am not entirely sure when the pivotal point was that I felt I began to love the characters – but it might well have been during Rose’s (their Mother) every day routines, and during her dialogue to her daughters. Rose came across as natural and wild which was a change from the familiar ‘heart in the right place / faced with a problem that tests him/her to the limit’ characters that we see in these genres.
I found the book had a huge emotional impact on me. The memories that were described in the present day (after us going through those events in real times in their childhood) is what had achieved this. There is a power in repetition – of living through an event and then re-living it through memory later on in years. Another powerful element was the use of showing ‘handwritten letters’ from one character to another. When a handwritten letter is used, we have the perfect medium of seeing how a character feels about another character, as opposed to a character speaking out how they feel through dialogue. The latter doesn’t quite have the same emotional impact as the first.
I loved how Saskia described location and setting, and how she used it during action and time of character reflection. Her choice of the natural world – the sea and beach, the trees and skies – were all perfect for the mood of the scenes and the story as a whole. The tower was particularly atmospheric too which to me made a connection to the dark fairy tales of childhood.
I thought the biggest negative element of the book was the inclusion of a storm at the end. The storm was used in order to stop the characters from contacting each other at a very crucial moment. This is a method used a lot in horror film. I think horror film gets away with it to a certain degree (as it adds to the fear and drama), but sometimes in books, I see it as somewhat cheating the reader. It is as though the story has been left to wander alone, left to chance, beyond character control. If there hadn’t been a storm for instance, then what would have happened? Would the characters have made a different choice? I suppose we could see that as being life in general – the cause and effect of our every day?
There was definitely a sadness to the book – a feeling of time lost, of regrets, of wanting to grab back the past. This is a universal emotion of which we can all relate. I also believe that it is one of the most powerful emotions in fiction – forcing our hearts to ponder over our own lives and experiences in the same way. Although we are living the characters experience, we are also very much living our own too. A parallel power.
The story also had a coming-of-age theme. We see the twins grow up and discover the twin boys as friends and first loves. We are also shown the dark side of eating disorders and how these can develop. Saskia approaches this difficult subject using such delicate yet powerful writing.
I would recommend this book to any one who has the tendency to feel nostalgic, and to those who often dwell on the past and daydream while doing so.
Before I say goodbye on this post, I’d like to give you an update on my writing and reading happenings. I have read seven books of varying themes this year, and my goal is to read eighteen. I have managed to review most of them, which can be found on Goodreads, but at the end of the year, I am going to write a 50-100 word review of each and post it here on my blog.
I have also been working on my first novel, which has been pending over many years. But I think this may be a good thing, because it seems to have morphed into something a lot more powerful than five years ago. I have an on-the-go file that I add to as I go about my day – popping in ideas on post its!
I hope you are having a creative year!
Will be back very soon!
Donna x
I want to hear more about your novel! Great to see you posting again.
Thanks Alex 🙂
Hi! I just want to say that what you’re doing is awesome! The best way to learn about writing is to learn from those who have been published. Being able to see more than just the words on the page is really important and the fact that you are able to pick it out and discuss it (and share what you’re learning too!) is great. Keep up the fantastic work and best of luck with your own novel!
Hi. Thank you so much for your kind words. I really do love to share my reviews with other readers, and likewise, reviews are something I enjoy reading from other writers. I think there are so many tricks to writing, it’s a mysterious little art. Thank you so much, it’s kind words such as yours that give me my motivation. I am coming over to visit your blog now. Best Wishes. Donna
Hi Donna,
I hadn’t heard of Saski Sarginson’s ‘The Twins’ before, so your review certainly piqued my interest. I wanted to know more, so did a spot of internet research. And, gosh, what an intriguingly atmospheric and mysterious novel it sounds – definitely one I’d like to read.
For now, I’ve a stack of signed crime novels to be getting on with, novels by leading authors of the genre bought at the recent, totally amazing ‘Alibis in the Archive’ event at Gladstone’s Library, Hawarden, reviewed on my blog ‘Grandy’s Landing’ 20/06/18.
But some day…
Great to hear you’re working on a first novel and look forward to hearing more about it in due course.
My very best – take care,
Paul
Hi Paul,
Thank you for your comment. It’s good to hear from you again, and great to hear you that you have been attending some literary events. They are really inspiring places to be. I have been to the Buckingham Literary Festival this year, and one talk was by Frederick Forsyth, and I managed to get a signed copy of his new biography, The Outsider. I have another full day brand new literary even in a couple of weeks, and a writing workshop in August. I certainly need some events to trigger the creativity sometimes. It is always nice to meet likeminded people too.
Your crime books sound great. Which authors signed / did you meet?
Yes this book was great. I read an excerpt of another of Saskia’s books at the end of this novel, and it is one I want to read. When you like a writers style it pulls you in. I recently read a collection of Daphne Du Maurier’s short stories, including ‘The Birds’, and I have fallen in love with her writing so much.
Best Wishes,
Donna
Hi Donna, thanks for visiting Grandy’s Landing and commenting on ‘Alibis in the Archive 2018’. In my reply I mention several of the authors I had the pleasure of chatting with over coffee or dinner.
The Buckingham Literary Festival sounds brilliant too. Gosh, Frederick Forsyth… I’ll never forget reading ‘The Day of the Jackal’ back in the ‘70s. Wish I could write a thriller like that!
Yes, meeting likeminded people at events like these is great. One of my fellow delegates at ‘Alibis’ turned out to be David Whittle, biographer of crime writer/composer Edmund Crispin (Bruce Montgomery).
Enjoy all your literary doings and take care,
Paul
Great👍
Thank you so much 🙂
I don’t get around to reading very many novels, but found this review very intriguing. I love the natural world, hand written letters and nostalgia. 🙂
Thanks Carl. I’m glad you found the review intriguing. I don’t get to read much either, so I have moved on to audiobooks now, easy listening on the go.